|
yesno
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: February 25, 2009, 05:03:32 PM » |
|
Suggestion from 030722, if you're looking for smaller bits. (45 seconds or so.)
Tom discussing things that have changed his life. at around 1:25.
edit: Also, same show: Tom being interviewed by Mullet Lad and giving some background on his life. At around the 2 hour mark.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 25, 2009, 05:39:22 PM by yesno »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
orator
|
|
« Reply #31 on: February 25, 2009, 06:47:25 PM » |
|
I'd suggest Jimmy Crespo
and the creepiest (or was it sleaziest?) rocker rant about Gary Puckett
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 25, 2009, 06:48:57 PM by orator »
|
Logged
|
"Come partake of my fruit baskets."
|
|
|
|
Chris L
|
|
« Reply #32 on: February 25, 2009, 07:27:59 PM » |
|
Gimme a Clem Gem
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Strut, pout, put it out, that's what you want from Grandma...
|
|
|
|
JonFromMaplewood
|
|
« Reply #33 on: February 25, 2009, 07:54:05 PM » |
|
Quick one to sneak in somewhere: Tom reading out the complete Order of Everything List. And maybe prepend it with a call that contributed to it (e.g. That which cannot be named?).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I wouldn't leave my kid with Val Kilmer. There. I said it."
|
|
|
|
A.M. Thomas
|
|
« Reply #34 on: February 25, 2009, 08:03:18 PM » |
|
I'd suggest Jimmy Crespo
and the creepiest (or was it sleaziest?) rocker rant about Gary Puckett
YES! The Jimmy Crespo/Mac call needs the BSG treatment. "Hey, how many pull ups can you do?" |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 I'm not a chicken, you're a turkey. |
|
|
mike_b
Policemans heel
Posts: 92
|
|
« Reply #35 on: February 25, 2009, 10:43:36 PM » |
|
Any of the Worst Song discussions would be great
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Steve in North Hollywood
|
|
« Reply #36 on: February 26, 2009, 08:41:50 AM » |
|
Quick one to sneak in somewhere: Tom reading out the complete Order of Everything List. And maybe prepend it with a call that contributed to it (e.g. That which cannot be named?).
What exactly are we talking about when we say "that which cannot be named?"* * Is it Juno? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I was in the shower and it occurred to me why the Hendersons named their guest "Harry." That movie has layers!" ~ Jack Doneghy, 30 Rock.
|
|
|
|
masterofsparks
|
|
« Reply #37 on: February 26, 2009, 10:01:21 AM » |
|
Quick one to sneak in somewhere: Tom reading out the complete Order of Everything List. And maybe prepend it with a call that contributed to it (e.g. That which cannot be named?).
What exactly are we talking about when we say "that which cannot be named?"* * Is it Juno?The television program Kings. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I'll probably go into the wee hours.
|
|
|
|
buffcoat
|
|
« Reply #38 on: February 26, 2009, 10:03:38 AM » |
|
Quick one to sneak in somewhere: Tom reading out the complete Order of Everything List. And maybe prepend it with a call that contributed to it (e.g. That which cannot be named?).
What exactly are we talking about when we say "that which cannot be named?"* * Is it Juno?Think "Relevant TV detective show + common ocean dwelling creature." |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Don't eff with the Cros.
|
|
|
|
Martin
|
|
« Reply #39 on: February 26, 2009, 10:10:22 AM » |
|
buffcoat, isn't that the who we're not talking about?
The what is something else.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Stupornaut
|
|
« Reply #40 on: February 26, 2009, 10:18:51 AM » |
|
Think inexplicable trailer-hitch accessories.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
twitter.com/natepatrin
|
|
|
|
JonFromMaplewood
|
|
« Reply #41 on: February 26, 2009, 10:33:58 AM » |
|
Think inexplicable trailer-hitch accessories.
Exactly. Although, maybe just Tom reading out The Order of Everything list in isolation - devoid of the calls that contributed to it - would be a good hook for people to listen to the longer podcast. They would be like "How in God's name did that insane list take shape? I need to know!" |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I wouldn't leave my kid with Val Kilmer. There. I said it."
|
|
|
|
Bryan
|
|
« Reply #42 on: February 26, 2009, 10:35:38 AM » |
|
Speaking of the order of everything: I just saw a dog sitting in the driver's seat of a car last night, and it made me 100% happier than I had previously been.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
buffcoat
|
|
« Reply #43 on: February 26, 2009, 11:52:53 AM » |
|
buffcoat, isn't that the who we're not talking about?
The what is something else.
Martin, You're (somewhat) right. I was talking about another "what" we're not talking about, but a "what" we're not talking about that is definitely related to "who" we're not talking about, as opposed the the "what" we're not talking about that we were (not) talking about. GUIDE to this post: What #1 - Monkfish Who - Captain Jack What #2 - TruckNutz That makes it all just so much clearer. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Don't eff with the Cros.
|
|
|
|
Martin
|
|
« Reply #44 on: February 26, 2009, 12:01:27 PM » |
|
Ah, gotcha!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
