Author Topic: The Devil and Daniel Johnston  (Read 5748 times)

Emerson

  • Tarsel tunnel syndrome
  • Posts: 309
Re: The Devil and Daniel Johnston
« Reply #15 on: March 07, 2007, 04:52:38 PM »
EDIT: That might not be an accurate description, as I'm kinda stupid when describing music, but I do like it. 

Just remember that everything is either "tight," "shambling" or "ethereal." You can't go wrong.

~EmD
"You said it. I didn't."

kenkwan

  • Tarsel tunnel syndrome
  • Posts: 401
Re: The Devil and Daniel Johnston
« Reply #16 on: March 07, 2007, 07:35:03 PM »
And for anyone that read the Mixerman Diaries, stuff can always use a bit more "soar".

Jason

  • Guest
Re: The Devil and Daniel Johnston
« Reply #17 on: March 07, 2007, 11:00:11 PM »
Although their influences could be described as "eclectic".

Chris L

  • Space Champion!
  • Posts: 2780
Re: The Devil and Daniel Johnston
« Reply #18 on: March 08, 2007, 09:44:12 AM »
Personally, I prefer songs with an "anthemic, fist-pumping" quality. 

Jason

  • Guest
Re: The Devil and Daniel Johnston
« Reply #19 on: March 08, 2007, 03:47:52 PM »
Also, if you can't think of three comparable bands, name two and put "et al" at the end.

Sarah

  • Guest
Re: The Devil and Daniel Johnston
« Reply #20 on: May 20, 2007, 02:51:54 PM »
So, I just watched The Devil and Daniel Johnston.  And I'm filled with the usual complicated reactions that hit me whenever I watch/read something to do with creativity and insanity.  But what struck me most was how motivated DJ was/is by a need to be famous.  How did/does his obsessive desire for celebrity fuel his craziness, I wonder?  Because it felt to me as though it has caused him some harm, egged him on to further madness in a way.  Conversely, how much did/does his desire for celebrity keep that same madness in check, by giving him a reason to be at least slightly in touch with the world? 

It's hard for me to think reasonably about these questions because I hold that the desire for fame is one of the least worthy ambitions that can fuel a life, and I mistrust and to some degree despise those who seek celebrity.  I also stumble when I'm shown yet again how the legitimately crazy use their craziness to get their own way.  There seemed to me to be a self-consciousness to much of DJ's behavior that annoyed me at times.  But that very self-consciousness may be what has kept him out of the bin (lately) or even alive, so who am I to complain?

The film also made me feel very sorry for crazy folk who don't have any talent or charm and so can't attract the attention of people who decide to care for them because they find them interesting.  And would people have paid so much attention to DJ if he hadn't been a bit bonkers?  How much of his status as a darling of indy (indie?) music resulted because he was an interesting curiosity?

Finally, his poor, poor parents . . .  And poor, poor Daniel Johnston when they die.  For I doubt if any of his devoted fans will be willing to put up with him when he needs someone to take his parents' place.

One more thing:  did DJ's little dance during the closing credits remind anyone else of that Star Wars kid's light saber performance?